<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digg Traffic vs. Google Traffic - Which One Is More Likely to Click on an Ad?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sabahan.com/2007/04/10/digg-traffic-vs-google-traffic-which-one-is-more-likely-to-click-on-an-ad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sabahan.com/2007/04/10/digg-traffic-vs-google-traffic-which-one-is-more-likely-to-click-on-an-ad/</link>
	<description>About Computers, Blogging, Making Money Online, Marketing and Interesting Stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ketyung</title>
		<link>http://www.sabahan.com/2007/04/10/digg-traffic-vs-google-traffic-which-one-is-more-likely-to-click-on-an-ad/#comment-24330</link>
		<dc:creator>ketyung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 02:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabahan.com/2007/04/10/digg-traffic-vs-google-traffic-which-one-is-more-likely-to-click-on-an-ad/#comment-24330</guid>
		<description>Digg users mostly techies. And techies seldom click on ads. Google traffic could consist lots of non-techies, who they're always curious about text ad link like adsense or banner ads, so they tend to click more :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg users mostly techies. And techies seldom click on ads. Google traffic could consist lots of non-techies, who they&#8217;re always curious about text ad link like adsense or banner ads, so they tend to click more <img src='http://www.sabahan.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaman</title>
		<link>http://www.sabahan.com/2007/04/10/digg-traffic-vs-google-traffic-which-one-is-more-likely-to-click-on-an-ad/#comment-24251</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabahan.com/2007/04/10/digg-traffic-vs-google-traffic-which-one-is-more-likely-to-click-on-an-ad/#comment-24251</guid>
		<description>The article is talking about chitika</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article is talking about chitika</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malique</title>
		<link>http://www.sabahan.com/2007/04/10/digg-traffic-vs-google-traffic-which-one-is-more-likely-to-click-on-an-ad/#comment-24247</link>
		<dc:creator>malique</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabahan.com/2007/04/10/digg-traffic-vs-google-traffic-which-one-is-more-likely-to-click-on-an-ad/#comment-24247</guid>
		<description>is you are already using digg, you should know what adsense is all about. Get my drift?  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is you are already using digg, you should know what adsense is all about. Get my drift?  <img src='http://www.sabahan.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azmeen</title>
		<link>http://www.sabahan.com/2007/04/10/digg-traffic-vs-google-traffic-which-one-is-more-likely-to-click-on-an-ad/#comment-24245</link>
		<dc:creator>Azmeen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabahan.com/2007/04/10/digg-traffic-vs-google-traffic-which-one-is-more-likely-to-click-on-an-ad/#comment-24245</guid>
		<description>Yep, digg and Slashdot traffic are virtually useless from a traffic to click conversion aspect. Essentially, technically-adept visitors make poor target audiences.

If Gaman doesn't mind me posting a link here, you might want to take a look at my recent take on &lt;a href="http://www.heritage-tech.net/401/five-secrets-of-high-adsense-earning-web-sites-that-the-experts-dont-want-you-to-know/" rel="nofollow"&gt;why a tech-savvy audience should not be targetted for AdSense earnings&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, digg and Slashdot traffic are virtually useless from a traffic to click conversion aspect. Essentially, technically-adept visitors make poor target audiences.</p>
<p>If Gaman doesn&#8217;t mind me posting a link here, you might want to take a look at my recent take on <a href="http://www.heritage-tech.net/401/five-secrets-of-high-adsense-earning-web-sites-that-the-experts-dont-want-you-to-know/" rel="nofollow">why a tech-savvy audience should not be targetted for AdSense earnings</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gaman</title>
		<link>http://www.sabahan.com/2007/04/10/digg-traffic-vs-google-traffic-which-one-is-more-likely-to-click-on-an-ad/#comment-24244</link>
		<dc:creator>Gaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabahan.com/2007/04/10/digg-traffic-vs-google-traffic-which-one-is-more-likely-to-click-on-an-ad/#comment-24244</guid>
		<description>The sentence should read "it's not surprising" not "it's surprising" :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sentence should read &#8220;it&#8217;s not surprising&#8221; not &#8220;it&#8217;s surprising&#8221; <img src='http://www.sabahan.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eZams</title>
		<link>http://www.sabahan.com/2007/04/10/digg-traffic-vs-google-traffic-which-one-is-more-likely-to-click-on-an-ad/#comment-24243</link>
		<dc:creator>eZams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 07:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sabahan.com/2007/04/10/digg-traffic-vs-google-traffic-which-one-is-more-likely-to-click-on-an-ad/#comment-24243</guid>
		<description>I believe Digg users do familiar with ads and they were information oriented user rather than Google users where come from searching process and they are buyer oriented. So we better derive traffic from Google Gaman. I go firstlah..LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Digg users do familiar with ads and they were information oriented user rather than Google users where come from searching process and they are buyer oriented. So we better derive traffic from Google Gaman. I go firstlah..LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
